Popular FPL Player Comparisons Ahead of FPL GW11

FPL GW11 Popular Player Comparisons

This week, we’re going to focus on some potential Antonio replacements, and try to break down that very competitive £5.5m-£6m midfielder position ahead of FPL GW11.

As always, a huge thank you to everyone who offers some suggestions for player comparisons – I can’t get around to including them all, but I do focus on the players, positions, and price-points that crop up a lot in discussions mid-week. After the next International Break, I plan on incorporating some more data sets to make each comparison more thorough.

[All statistics taken from FFSCOUT]

Before going further, Do vote in this week’s FPL GW11 allaboutfpl captaincy poll. The same will be available in the captaincy analysis and metrics blog written by@AK_FPL1. The metrics has an 9/10 record this year. Last week the metric predicted Salah as the best captaincy candidate and he returned once again in GW10. Stay tuned for the GW10 Captaincy metric to see who tops it. Link to all our FPL Gameweek 11 blogs.

[Total_Soft_Poll id=”20″]

The results and the captaincy metric blog will be published soon based on the votes.

Jimenez (£7.6m) vs Wilson (£7.3m):

FPL GW11 Player Comparisons- Jimenez vs Wilson

With the second most-picked player Antonio hitting questionable form and a mixed fixture run, you may be looking to replace him. Alternatively, you could be looking to move on an under-performing Toney or Armstrong.

After a rocky start, it’s lovely to see Jimenez back in form. Meanwhile, Wilson is bagging some consistent points. Both are likely to be their respective teams’ main goal threat, and with so many popular picks falling short they are going to be among the most transferred in assets over the next few weeks.

Jimenez vs Wilson: The Stats

JimenezWilson
Goals2 (0.2)4 (0.7)
Assists1 (0.1)0
xGI4.03 (0.40)2.85 (0.50)
Post-Shot xG1.66 (0.2)2 (0.3)
Goal Attempts22 (2.2)14 (2.3)
Shots in Box1911
Big Chances6 (0.60)5 (0.80)
Penalty Area Touches5227
Crosses21

Although they aren’t worlds apart, Wilson slightly edges Jimenez on average, but his data is a little skewed.

Jimenez is among the top ten strikers for xGI, goal attempts, and shots inside the box. However, his regular starting spot has been brought into question after he was benched against Aston Villa. The general consensus is that he is definitely Wolves’ first-choice striker, and it is players around him like Hwang and Traore who will be rotated more heavily.

Jimenez’s Heatmaps

Wilson’s Heatmaps

Wolves vs Newcastle at a Glance

WolvesNewcastle
Goals1111
Penalty Area Touches214 (10th)199 (13th)
Chances Created91 (10th)83 (14th)
Goal Attempts121 (11th)112 (15th)
Shots on Target37 (joint 10th)29 (the 2nd lowest)
Shots Conceded114 (4th)163 (the most of all teams)
Goals Conceded1023

It’s clear that Wolves have posed a much greater attacking threat than Newcastle. However, this can’t be pinned down to just the opening fixtures, as both teams have had fairly similar fixture difficulties. Therefore, Wolves and Jimenez have the edge here.

WolvesNewcastle
crybha
WHUBRE
norars
BURNOR
LIVBUR
mcilei
bhaliv

Looking at this, it’s quite difficult to argue strongly for one player. Both teams face some struggling sides, but neither hit a consistent run of favourable fixtures. However, to be precise:

  • Overall, Newcastle’s next six opponents have conceded more shots than Wolves’ upcoming opponents
  • Newcastle’s next opponents have also conceded more big chances

So, on paper, Newcastle are facing weaker defensive teams. However, Newcastle haven’t had as great an attacking threat as Wolves.

Jimenez vs Wilson: The Verdict

This is definitely a tight decision, and one that you could justify going either way.

For me, Jimenez seems to be the safer option. Wolves have played some great football over the last few weeks and are, if anything, unlucky to have not secured some points against United and Spurs.

However, I can see Wilson being a really nice differential from now until around GW15.

Further Read: What To Expect From Antonio Conte At Tottenham? | Tactical Analysis

Gallagher (£5.7m) vs Mbeumo (£5.6m) vs Cornet (£6m) vs Smith Rowe (£5.6m)

FPL GW11 Popular Player Comparisons- Smith Rowe vs Mbeumo vs Gallagher vs Cornet
FPL GW11 Player Comparison- Budget Midfielders

This week, we’re taking a huge look at the budget midfielders, who have all racked up some impressive scores.

Gallagher, Mbeumo, and Cornet, and Smith-Rowe have had some (mostly) unexpected break-out seasons, and with Kane, Lukaku, and Bruno falling short of their price tags, this price-point is a highly contested one. It may be that one asset is the stand-out player to get, or perhaps a combination of these picks is necessary to maximise your budget.

The Stats

GallagherMbeumoCornetESR
Goals0.3 0 (3)0.20 (2)0.80 (4)0.30 (3)
Assists2000
xGI0.50 (4.18)0.40 (4.03)0.20 (1.23)0.20 (2.49)
Post-Shot xG0.40 (3.50)0.30 (2.33)0.40 (1.9)0.20 (1.71)
Goal Attempts2.3 (21)2.4 (22)1.6 (8)1.4 (14)
Shots in Box1314612
Big Chances0.40 (4)0.60 (5)0.40 (2)0.20 (2)
Penalty Area Touches31381028
Crosses3915515
  • Gallagher and Mbeumo are among the top ten midfielders for xGI
  • Mbeumo is among the top ten midfielders for shots inside the box
  • Mbeumo and Gallagher are among the top ten midfielders for big chances

Looking at this, Gallagher and Mbeumo are the ones who make the best case, as the most consistent of the lot. However, it’s unfortunate that we don’t have as much data for Cornet, because he’s been getting some huge numbers in such a short space of time. It’s also unfortunate that Palace, Brentford, and Burnley are arguably very inconsistent teams, so putting our trust in them may be difficult.

Nevertheless, Smith-Rowe, although putting in some great performances, hasn’t quite hit the same level, and falls slightly behind the others for attempts, shots, and big chances.

I think looking at their respective teams is going to be very important here.

Gallagher’s Heatmaps

Mbeumo’s Heatmaps

Cornet’s Heatmaps

Smith-Rowe’s Heatmaps

PalaceBrentfordBurnleyArsenal
Goals13121012
Penalty Area Touches204193175228
Chances Created797686107
Goal Attempts109116118140
Shots on Target30363745
Shots Conceded122115155149
Goals Conceded14121613

Although Smith-Rowe falls slightly short of the other options, Arsenal definitely come out on top as the team with the most attacking threat. What’s clear is that the attacking returns are spread out more over the Arsenal side, whereas Gallagher and Cornet seem to be a huge focal point in their teams.

After Arsenal, it really is quite an even playing field. Although most FPL managers will be sceptical of Burnley, they have registered more chances created, goal attempts, and shots on target than Palace and Brentford.

Crystal PalaceBrentfordBurnleyArsenal
WOLNORcheWAT
burnewCRYliv
AVLEVETOTNEW
leetotwolmun
munleeneweve
EVEWATWHUSOU
SOUMUNWATWHU

Looking at this, I would still be wary of making a move for Cornet – Burnley will soon face Chelsea and Tottenham, and will definitely be going into those games the least favourite. However, after their win over Brentford, I can see why some would want to bring in Cornet as soon as possible, while he is still so sparsely owned.

Arsenal also have a questionable fixture run – facing Liverpool, United, Everton, and West Ham soon – that would maybe put me off owning ESR, especially when other options have nicer fixtures.

I can understand taking advantage of Brentford’s next two matches against Norwich and Newcastle, but after that Mbeumo may be taking up a bench spot or drawing some blanks. I actually think Palace have a nice little fixture run from now to GW14, so Gallagher would be a good player to bet on.

Gallagher vs Mbeumo vs Cornet vs ESR: The Verdict

I still stand by the fact that the other assets here are more appealing to me than Cornet, just because with him I feel like I would be chasing last week’s points and I’m still not so convinced that Burnley will be scoring consistently.

I think the easier set-and-forget option is Gallagher based on Palace’s upcoming fixtures, but taking advantage of Mbeumo against Norwich and Newcastle is also a popular move – just keep in mind that you may have to move him on or bench him in some of the games afterwards.

Smith-Rowe is also an option who may have to be rotated over the next few weeks, but maybe in combination with someone like Mbeumo or Gallagher he could have a more long-term place in your squad.

Further Reads from ALLABOUTFPL Ahead of FPL GW11:

What To Expect From Antonio Conte At Tottenham? | Tactical Analysis
FPL GW10 Sunday Fixtures Review Based on Stats and Eye Test
FPL GW10 Saturday Fixtures Review Based on Stats and Eye Test

Link to all our FPL Gameweek 11 blogs.

Thanks for reading the ‘FPL GW11 Popular Player Comparisons’ blog. Keep checking allaboutfpl.com for regular blogs. Also, follow our 40000+community on InstagramFacebook, and Twitter to stay updated on regular Posts and FPL updates. Link to all our FPL Gameweek 11 blogs.

AllAboutFPL November mini-league give away

Visit Drafthound.com for more free stats, data, and more!

What’s next from ALLABOUTFPL ahead of FPL Gameweek 11?

We’ll be covering fixture analysis, differential picks, GW11 Wildcard drafts, captaincy metrics, transfer trend analysis, expected line up, press conference summaries, Buy, hold, sell analysis for FPL GW11, our expert panel team reveals and more. Keep checking allaboutfpl.com for all our blogs and subscribe to our free newsletter through the link below. We’ll also be posting regularly about the same on our social media accounts so follow us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook keep our notification ON.

ALLABOUTFPL Newsletter
AllaboutFPL is rated as the 9th best Fantasy Football blog in the world by Feedspot, So make sure you don’t miss out on our content

Our content is always free and if you like our content do drop a comment, follow, subscribe, and support us. Your love is what keeps us going:)

Upload your squads to FFFix and unlock a whole lot of features

FPL Gameweek 11 FPL Deadline Countdown

Login and set your team for FPL GW11 now!

The following two tabs change content below.
Back To Top