The busy Christmas period is continuing to bring some unexpected surprises, with news of COVID outbreaks in the Tottenham, Brighton, Norwich, Man United, and Aston Villa squads. It seems that hits are being taken now more than ever, so bringing in the players that will make those hits worth it are crucial to move up the ranks ahead of FPL GW18.
The player comparisons we’re looking ahead of FPL GW18 are:
- Watkins vs Antonio
- Mount vs Maddison
- Bowen vs Gallagher vs Ødegaard
- Cash vs Dalot vs Tierney vs Coufal
I’m definitely working on adding the eye-est where I can and to maybe not narrow my thoughts so much when looking at stats! Choosing King over Dennis taught me a valuable (if painful) lesson.
Before going further, Do vote in this week’s FPL GW18 allaboutfpl captaincy poll. The same will be available in the captaincy analysis and metrics blog written by@AK_FPL1. The metrics has a 15/16 record this year. Last week the metric predicted Salah as the best captaincy candidate and he returned once again in GW16. Stay tuned for the FPL GW18 Captaincy metric to see who tops it. Link to all our FPL Gameweek 18 blogs.
[Total_Soft_Poll id=”28″]
The results and the captaincy metric blog will be published soon based on the votes.
[All stats taken from FBREF when possible – stats not included on this site are taken from FFSCOUT]
Watkins (£7.7m) vs Antonio (£7.9m)
*Update: West Ham’s game against Norwich in FPL GW18 in postponed due to Covid Outbreak and Antonio will blank in GW18.
The striker positions have been up in the air for a few weeks, with Kane, Toney, Jiménez, and Wilson now falling out of favour for many reasons.
Villa’s upcoming fixtures and the great bounce they have had since Steven Gerrard took over means that Watkins is now among the most transferred-in players over the last week. Antonio, on the other hand, is an asset who returned so consistently at the beginning of the season, but has registered only one attacking return (an assist) since GW10.
I’m going to look at both assets to consider what makes Watkins such an attractive pick, and to analyse how and why Antonio has been drawing so many blanks.
Watkins vs Antonio: The Stats
Watkins | Antonio | |
Starts / Minutes | 14 / 1271 | 16 / 1435 |
Total Points | 61 | 75 |
Points per Game | 4.1 | 4.7 |
Goals | 5 | 6 |
npxG / per 90 | 5.2 / 0.37 | 5.2 / 0.32 |
xG / per 90 | 5.2/ 0.37 | 5.4 / 0.34 |
Fantasy Assists / Assists | 1 / 1 | 2 / 4 |
xA / per 90 | 1 / 0.07 | 3.9 / 0.24 |
npxG + xA / per 90 | 6.2 / 0.44 | 13.1 / 0.32 |
xG + xA / per 90 | 6.2/ 0.44 | 13.3 / 0.44 |
Shots / Shots on Target | 28 / 13 | 44 / 12 |
Key Passes / per 90 | 14 / 0.99 | 29 / 1.82 |
% Goal Inolvement | 33 | 37 |
% FPL Goal Involvement | 39 | 44 |
Predictably, Antonio beats Watkins, but a lot of his overpowering stats come from GW1 to GW9, which was the last time he scored a goal. Since GW10, Watkins beats Antonio comfortably on most stats.
Watkins’ numbers are also great and the performance he, and Villa, put on Wednesday night will catch a lot of attention. Since Gerrard took over, Watkins has been positioned predominantly as a central striker, without Ings.
Here are Watkins’ heatmaps from GW4-11 and GW12-17 (from FFSCOUT):
As we can see, Watkins does have an affinity towards the left hand side, where he played during Gerrard’s first game and before this, where he either played as a second striker or left winger to Ings.
Average Position (FFSCOUT):
So, what has gone wrong for Antonio? Well, as we will see, nothing West Ham’s attacking threat,
Since Antonio started blanking, it has been Bowen who is the stand-out Hammers player with 18 goal attempts from GW10-16 compared to Antonio’s 11. Antonio has also been a lot less clinical. Since GW10, he has had only one shot on target.
Full credits to @SwiftyFpl on Twitter for this shot-map resource; check it out here https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/greg.johnson6877/viz/EPLShotMaps2021-22/ShotMapDash
Here’s Antonio’s shot map for GW1-9 compared to GW10-16.
There is, expectedly, a huge difference. These numbers are probably very familiar to Antonio’s owners right now, and we have to ask ourselves whether he is worth selling.
Antonio’s Maps [ FFSCOUT ]
Villa vs West Ham at a Glance
Villa | West Ham | |
W / D / L | 7 / 1 / 9 | 8 / 4 / 5 |
Goals (Pens) | 23 (2) | 28 (1) |
npxG / xG | 16.2 / 17.6 | 20.5 / 22.3 |
npxG / xG per 90 | 0.95 / 1.03 | 1.21 / 1.31 |
Chances Created | 140 | 162 |
Goal Attempts | 191 | 233 |
Shots on Target / per 90 | 58 / 3.41 | 72 / 4.24 |
Crosses | 218 | 234 |
However, West Ham have displayed some great attacking numbers despite Antonio’s dip in form – I’ll discuss the Arsenal game as well when data becomes available. They are still right up there with the likes of Liverpool, City, and Chelsea in their attacking numbers, and are seriously contending for a top finish this season. This does make it even more frustrating that Antonio has blanked for so long.
West Ham vs Arsenal:
This was a poorer game from West Ham:
- Only 4 chances created
- 1 shot on target
- 7 goal attempts
This was obviously a bit of a disappointment, but we can’t ignore the brilliant form they have shown throughout the season, including beating Chelsea and Livepool.
Aston Villa | West Ham |
BUR | NOR |
CHE | SOU |
lee | wat |
bre | cry |
MUN | LEE |
eve | mun |
LEE | WAT |
new | lei |
Both teams have a great set of fixtures that haven’t gone unnoticed. Villa have a few blips with Chelsea and United, but other than that they face some struggling teams.
The same can be said for West Ham, who have a more consistent run of 5 games where Antonio and Bowen will be really popular. Hopefully we will see West Ham bounce back during this time.
Watkins vs Antonio: The Verdict
Before GW17, there was a real possibility that Watkins could have been a trap player, but a lack of forward options and his fixture run made him a very popular transfer. He definitely paid off, and although his assist was a bit of luck he registered 6 shots and 3 attempted assists. Watkins is a certain hold for me, and I think bringing him in is a great move.
Antonio is a bit of a trickier situation. The view that I, and many other FPL managers hold, is that it still feels like a risk taking him out when we know what West Ham can provide and their upcoming fixtures. However, Antonio will now blank in GW18 due to a postponement.
With so many delays now being announced, we have no idea what the short term will look like. Watkins is the stand-out striker option, and I think Lacazette deserves some thought. Personally, I will be making moves in my midfield and leaving Watkins as my only striker, with Antonio surviving. I still think his upcoming fixtures make it very risky to sell him, with most giving him a final chance during this run.
Further Read: FPL GW18 Ultimate Guide: Tips, Differentials, Player Comparisons, Trends And Captaincy
Mount (£7.6m) vs Maddison (£6.8m)
The Man City midfielders come in at a similar price and have long been contested, but these two more differential picks have been in great form and definitely deserve consideration.
Leicester’s game against Everton in FPL GW18 in postponed due to Covid Outbreak and Maddison will blank in GW18. With Werner, Lukaku and Hudson-Odoi testing positive for COVID-19, Mount’s place in the starting 11 looks more nailed than ever. Maddison won’t be an option now
Now with blanks for popular picks Bowen and Gallagher, space is opening up in our teams to opt for a nailed Mount in fine form. Maddison is not an option right now, but I began this article before his cancellations were announced, so I will use his numbers to analyse Mount’s form and as a possible option in the future.
Mount vs Maddison: The Stats
Mount | Maddison | |
Starts / Minutes | 10 / 888 | 12 / 1010 |
Total Points | 84 | 69 |
Points per Game | 6 | 4.3 |
Goals | 7 | 4 |
npxG / xG | 4.3 / 5 | 3.2 |
npxG / xG per 90 | 0.43 / 0.51 | 0.28 |
Fantasy Assists / Assists | 1 / 4 | 1 / 3 |
xA | 3.1 | 1.9 |
xA per 90 | 0.31 | 0.17 |
npxG + xA / xG + xA | 7.4 / 8.1 | 5 |
npxG +xA / xG + xA per 90 | 0.75 / 0.82 | 0.45 |
Shots / Shots on Target | 28 / 16 | 29 / 13 |
Key Passes (per 90) | 20 (2.02) | 15 (1.34) |
Crosses | 33 | 15 |
% Goal Involvement | 44 | 37 |
% FPL Goal Involvement | 48 | 42 |
Overall, Mount comes out on top, and with less rotation available to Tuchel he’s a strong candidate. However, do Chelsea’s recent results make him a risk?
Maddison still has some impressive numbers, and in the future he could be a strong differential.
Mount’s Maps [ FFSCOUT ]
When Jorginho is not on the pitch, Mount has successfully taken penalties and is also involved in corners and free kicks.
Maddison is also on free kicks and corners.
Chelsea vs Leicester at a Glance
Chelsea | Leicester | |
W / D / L | 6 / 4 / 6 | |
Goals (Pens) | 39 (5) | 27 (1) |
xG / npxG | 24.1 / 23.4 | |
x G / npxG per 90 | 1.51 / 1.46 | |
Chances Created | 132 | |
Goal Attempts | 188 | |
Shots on Target | 74 | |
Crosses | 129 |
Leicester have definitely been up and down so far this season, but what is apparent is the fact that they are right up their attacking-wise, but fall flat in their defence. Their defensive record will be of less concern though.
Chelsea have been the better team so far, despite their slight dip in form recently. Perhaps their upcoming fixtures will allow them to bounce back.
Chelsea | Leicester |
wol | eve |
avl | mci |
BHA | LIV |
LIV | NOR |
mci | bur |
TOT | BHA |
[none] | liv |
[none] | WHU |
Although Chelsea have a short run of nice games, after that they meet Liverpool, City, and Tottenham in succession. Another issue with Chelsea assets is their upcoming double blank gameweeks. Therefore, doubling or tripling up on Chelsea assets will be quite risky, and it’s likely that you’ll already have at least one of their defenders.
However, Leicester’s next fixtures are a little dissuading – they meet City and Liverpool back-to-back, and benching an 8 million player seems risky, especially since the number of COVID postponements. They do have a nice short run just as Chelsea’s fixtures become less favourable, so there is the possibility of moving Mount on for Maddison for those fixtures.
Mount vs Maddison: The Verdict
Before recent updates, I would have considered Mount a risky pick. However, with many popular midfielders now blanking this weekend, if you already have a City midfielder I think Mount is a great option. He may be a short-term pick with difficult fixtures and blank gameweeks coming up, but as of now his games against Wolves, Villa, and Brighton look appealing. Rotation is always a risk with Tuchel, and we have already lost out on some great points from him, but here’s hoping that Mount maintains his form.
Maddison would be an interesting prospect, but one that is unavailable right now!
Further Read: FPL GW18 Ultimate Guide: Tips, Differentials, Player Comparisons, Trends And Captaincy
Bowen (£6.5m) vs Gallagher (£6.2m) vs Ødegaard (£5.5m)
*Update: West Ham’s game against Norwich and Palace’s game against Watford in FPL GW18 in postponed due to Covid Outbreak which means both Bowen and Gallagher will blank in GW18. This section was written beforehand.
This budget midfield position is crucial, and Conor Gallagher burst back onto everyone’s radars when he bagged two goals against Everton. As ever, Bowen is still a very popular target in a strong West Ham side with great fixtures. Odegaard, on the other hand, has hit some great form and definitely warrants considerations as a differential.
Bowen vs Gallagher vs Ødegaard: The Stats
Bowen | Gallagher | Ødegaard | |
Starts / Minutes | 16 / 1404 | 16 / 1408 | 11 / 983 |
Total Points | 76 | 89 | 54 |
Points per Game | 4.5 | 5.6 | 3.6 |
Goals | 3 | 6 | 4 |
npxG / per 90 | 6.3 / 0.32 | 3.6 / 0.23 | 1.2 / 0.11 |
Fantasy Assists / Assists | 3 / 4 | 2 / 3 | 0 / 0 |
xA / per 90 | 2.6 / 0.17 | 3 / 0.19 | 1.6 / 0.14 |
npxG + xA / per 90 | 7.6 / 0.48 | 6.6 / 0.42 | 2.8 / 0.26 |
Shots / Shots on Target | 42 / 16 | 34 / 14 | 14 / 7 |
Key Passes / per 90 | 25 / 1.6 | 27 / 1.73 | 24 / 2.2 |
Crosses | 32 | 37 | 8 |
% Goal Involvement | 25 | 39 | 22 |
% FPL Goal Involvement | 36 | 48 | 27 |
Bowen’s stats are still looking great, and these will really deter people from selling him.
Gallagher had a few games playing a lot deeper, but since the game against Everton he seems to be back to his old ways.
Ødegaard’s figures are unfortunately skewed, but he’s coming away from some really impressive games and is in fine form.
Bowen’s Maps( FFSCOUT )
Bowen also takes corners, and operates hugely on the wing.
Gallagher’s Maps( FFSCOUT )
Gallagher’s maps are a lot more sporadic, but he does operate on the right mostly.
Ødegaard’s Maps( FFSCOUT )
Ødegaard has a slightly different role, with most of his shots coming from outside the box or from free kicks.
[All maps taken from FFSCOUT]
West Ham vs Palace vs Arsenal at a Glance
West Ham | Palace | Arsenal | |
W / D / L | 8 / 4 / 5 | 4 / 8 / 5 | 9 / 2 / 6 |
Goals (Pens) | 28 (1) | 24 (2) | 23 (0) |
npxG / xG | 20.5 / 22.5 | 19.2 / 20.7 | 20.9 / 23.2 |
npxG / xG per 90 | 1.21 / 1.31 | 1.13 / 1.22 | 1.23 / 1.37 |
Chances Created | 162 | 138 | 185 |
Goal Attempts | 233 | 191 | 246 |
Shots on Target | 72 | 61 | 80 |
Crosses | 234 | 191 | 169 |
As always, West Ham’s stats are great.
Arsenal, although they have had their ups and downs, also have some great attacking numbers, making Odegaard an even stronger differential, so long as he can retain his place in the starting 11.
Although Palace fall slightly behind, they have really shown up against the likes of West Ham, City, Arsenal, and Leicester.
West Ham | Crystal Palace | Arsenal |
NOR | wat | lee |
SOU | tot | nor |
wat | NOR | WOL |
cry | WHU | MCI |
LEE | bha | tot |
mun | LIV | BUR |
WAT | nor | wol |
lei | bre | [none] |
Again, West Ham’s fixtures are making their assets really favourable right now.
Gallagher, although he has some difficult fixtures now and again, also has some great games in Watford and Norwich. Right now, he’s a great way to ensure you have a strong bench, and we have seen him surprise against top teams.
Taking a punt on Ødegaard could be a great shout in the short term as Arsenal face Leeds, Norwich, and Wolves.
Bowen vs Gallagher vs Ødegaard: The Verdict
I would have considered Bowen and Gallagher firm holds, but I think now is the time to start upgrading to City, Chelsea, or Arsenal assets, since both will blank in GW18.
Right now, opting for Ødegaard as a differential is a risk, but in an in-form Arsenal side with some great upcoming fixtures, at £5.5m he could be a steal. However, many of us will already have ESR. Although if he starts there’s a strong chance he maintains his brilliant form, because Ødegaard is vying for a spot with him, Martinelli, and Saka, he may be too risky at a time when we don’t have bench cover. Personally, I would lean towards Tierney or Lacazette for the next Arsenal position (other than Ramsdale).
Further Read: FPL GW18 Ultimate Guide: Tips, Differentials, Player Comparisons, Trends And Captaincy
Cash (£5m) vs Dalot (£4.5m) vs Tierney (£4.7m) vs Coufal (£4.7m)
The budget defender position is really heating up. All of these options are under 5% owned and are just emerging as potential picks.
Tierney caught my eye after reading this thread by @SnakeFpl – he makes great points; definitely check it out:
*This article was started before Coufal’s red card – right now, he isn’t an option, but I kept his stats in here to better analyse the others.
**United’s game vs Brighton is called off this weekend. So Dalot is no more a option ahead of FPL GW18.
Cash vs Dalot vs Tierney vs Coufal: The Stats
Cash | Tierney | Dalot | Coufal | ||
Starts / Minutes | 17/ 1515 | 11 / 926 | 3 / 361 | 11 / 1004 | |
Total Points | 56 | 55 | 16 | 29 | |
Points per Game | 3.3 | 5 | 2.3 | 2.1 | |
Goals | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
npxG / per 90 | 1.1 / 0.06 | 0.3 / 0.03 | 0.2 / 0.06 | 0.3 / 0.02 | |
Fantasy Assists / Assists | 0 / 0 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 2 | |
xA / per 90 | 0.8 / 0.05 | 1 / 0.1 | 0.1 / 0.02 | 1.5 / 0.14 | |
npxG + xA / per 90 | 1.9 / 0.11 | 1.3 / 0.13 | 0.3 | 0.3 / 0.16 | |
Shots / Shots on Target | 17 / 4 | 8 / 2 | 3 / 2 | 7 / 2 | |
Key Passes (per 90) | 8 (0.48) | 13 (1.26) | 2 (0.50) | 11 (0.98) | |
Crosses | 47 | 35 | 17 | 36 | |
% Goal Involvement | 5 | 15 | 0 | 10 | |
% FPL Goal Involvement | 5 | 15 | 0 | 10 | |
Clean Sheets | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | |
Goals Conceded | 22 | 12 | 5 | 15 | |
Yellow Cards | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 (1 red) | |
% Aerial Duels Won | 51.8 | 23.5 | 81.8 | 39.3 | |
% Tackles Won | 69.4 | 90.9 | 62.5 | 78.3 | |
Blocks / Clearances | 3 / 34 | 2 / 25 | 3 / 10 | 2 / 25 | |
Errors Leading to Chance / Goal | 1 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
Unfortunately, Dalot is an uncertainty and his data is also skewed. However, particularly with Livramento dipping in form, he is a bargain at £4.4m.
Cash in particular is providing some great numbers, and with Villa looking more stable under Gerrard he is a great pick. One thing to keep in mind is that he is one yellow card away from a suspension.
These assets attack in a very similar way, providing crosses from their respective flanks – @SnakeFpl uses Tierney’s map in his thread.
[Attempted assists of Cash, Tierney, Dalot, Coufal from FFFIX]
Cash’s Maps( FFSCOUT )
Tierney’s Maps( FFSCOUT )
Dalot’s Maps( FFSCOUT )
Coufal’s Maps( FFSCOUT )
[All maps taken from FFSCOUT]
Villa vs United vs Arsenal vs West Ham at a Glance
Aston Villa | Man United | Arsenal | West Ham | |
W / D / L | 7 / 1 / 9 | 8 / 3 / 5 | 9 / 2 / 6 | 8 / 4 / 5 |
Goals (Pens) | 23 (2) | 26 (2) | 23 (0) | 28 (1) |
npxG / xG | 16.2 / 17.6 | 20.5 / 22.7 | 20.9 / 23.2 | 20.5 / 22.5 |
npxG / xG per 90 | 0.95 / 1.03 | 1.28 / 1.42 | 1.23 / 1.37 | 1.21 / 1.31 |
Chances Created | 126 | 183 | 185 | 162 |
Goal Attempts | 174 | 220 | 246 | 233 |
Shots on Target | 58 | 75 | 80 | 72 |
Crosses | 218 | 176 | 169 | 234 |
Goals Conceded / per 90 | 25 / 1.47 | 24 / 1.50 | 22 / 1.29 | 21 / 1.24 |
Shots on Target Conceded | 71 | 74 | 81 | 74 |
Crosses Conceded | 294 | 290 | 151 | 152 |
- Villa have only created 27.9% of chances down the right – that’s the lowest of any team so far
- United have only created 29% of chances down the right – this was at just 22.9% from GW14-16, when Dalot has started – although there is a very small sample size here
- Arsenal have created 30.8% of chances down their left – this was slightly higher when Tierney started between GW1-8 (37.6%)
- West Ham have created 36.4% of chances down the right – marginally lower than chances down the left, but the majority of chances have come down their flanks
All teams have their appeal here, so it’s crucial to look at upcoming fixtures as well.
Aston Villa | Man United | Arsenal | West Ham |
BUR | bre | lee | NOR |
CHE | BHA | nor | SOU |
lee | new | WOL | wat |
bre | BUR | MCI | cry |
MUN | WOL | tot | LEE |
eve | avl | BUR | mun |
LEE | WHU | wol | WAT |
new | bur | [none] | lei |
All assets have some very attractive fixtures coming up.
Villa, United, and West Ham’s fixtures are definitely being targeted by FPL managers – but United’s COVID postponements are putting a spanner in the works. Tierney also has some great short-term fixtures coming up.
Cash vs Dalot vs Tierney vs Coufal: The Verdict
Obviously Coufal isn’t an option right now, but maybe when he’s back he will be added to the list again.
United’s fixture on the weekend is postponed, so he’s not an option right now either.
Cash and Tierney are the stand-out differential defender picks for me. With so many unknowns already, Tierney’s competition with Nuno Tavares might be off-putting. However, he could be a great way to invest in the Arsenal defence with some attacking threat.
I think with Villa’s upcoming fixtures Cash could shine too. It’s a difficult decision between the two, and one that could depend on squad structure.
Right now, I don’t think there’s a wrong decision – I’m still torn between which asset to bring in this week, and I definitely think it’s wise to leave any transfers until the last minute.
Thank you, as always, for taking the time to read this! I’m definitely still learning, but I take these articles very seriously and I’m always thankful that I can write about something I’m passionate about every week. Any feedback or advice is always welcome 🙂
Stay safe everyone, and good luck!
Further Reads from ALLABOUTFPL Ahead of FPL Gameweek 18:
FPL GW18 Ultimate Guide: Tips, Differentials, Player Comparisons, Trends And Captaincy
What is FPL CUP? What are the rules? How to win the 2021/22 FPL CUP?
2021/22 FPL Chip Strategy: What to do with the Elusive Boosts
We have also made an elaborate guide covering every rule and chip available in FPL for the 2021/22 FPL Season ~ 2021/22 Fantasy Premier League Season Rules, Tips | The Ultimate Guide
Thanks for reading the ‘FPL GW18 Player Comparisons’ blog. Keep checking allaboutfpl.com for regular blogs. Also, follow our 40,000+community on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter to stay updated on regular Posts and FPL updates.
Link to all our FPL Gameweek 18 blogs.
What’s next from ALLABOUTFPL ahead of FPL GW18?
We’ll be covering fixture analysis, differential picks, GW18 Wildcard drafts, captaincy metrics, transfer trend analysis, expected line up, press conference summaries, Buy, hold, sell analysis for FPL GW18, our expert panel team reveals and more. Keep checking allaboutfpl.com for all our blogs and subscribe to our free newsletter through the link below. We’ll also be posting regularly about the same on our social media accounts so follow us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook keep our notification ON.
Our content is always free and if you like our content do drop a comment, follow, subscribe, and support us. Your love is what keeps us going:)
FPL Gameweek 18 FPL Deadline Countdown
Login and set your team for FPL GW18 now!
Sophie Wellington
Latest posts by Sophie Wellington (see all)
- Best £6.5m FPL Midfielders Comparison for 2024/25 FPL Season - August 14, 2024
- Team wise Best FPL Differentials for the 2024/25 Season - August 6, 2024
- Best £6.5m FPL Midfielders- Stats, Comparison ahead of GW1 - August 9, 2023