Best FPL Budget Enablers to Target – Position wise | FPL GW22

The festive fixture chaos often paves the way for stability among budget picks. At this stage of the season, some under-the-radar names start earning regular starting spots, helping FPL managers snag these “budget-enablers”. In this article, we look at the “Best FPL Budget Enablers” to consider from GW22 for the FPL 2025/26 season.

Link to all our FPL GW22 blogs including scout picks, players to target, buy, hold, sell analysis, differentials, captaincy metrics, best forwards, and more. Completely free to access as well!

FPL Budget Enablers to consider from GW22 onwards

Goalkeepers

Kelleher (£4.5m)

This year has seen far more popularity for premium keepers like Raya and Pope. However, some might pivot to a cheaper option to fund high-DefCon potential defenders. Kelleher at Brentford stands out in this category, alongside Dubravka (4.0m). While the next set of fixtures looks mixed, Brentford embark on an excellent run post-GW27. He is averaging 2.9 saves per 90 minutes this season.

Most Saves in Premier League this season:

  • Dubravka- 77
  • Roefs- 73
  • Areola- 67
  • Verbruggen- 61
  • Kelleher- 60

Budget Defenders

Alderete (£4.1m) / Mukiele (£4.4m) / Reinildo (£3.8m)

The Sunderland boys have provided incredible value this season. Despite a slight dip in performance, for a promoted team sitting in the top half of the table by mid-January is commendable. Over the last 6 GWs, Sunderland are averaging 1.7 xGC/90. A major appeal comes with the DefCon ability:

AldereteMukiele
CBIT per 9010.1310.00
Headed Attempts per 900.510.17
*Data taken from FFHub over last 6 GWs

Reinildo could be a popular choice with his return from Afcon imminent; he is expected to slot right back into the starting XI. Over his 12 appearances, he has averaged a CBIT per 90 of ~7.92.

Further, a double-up to save extra cash could be a smart strategy. They face a somewhat lethargic Palace, West Ham, Burnley and Leeds till GW29. Plus, the price point allows benchability against Arsenal and Liverpool.

Micky Van de Ven (£4.6m)

Spurs this season have been far from perfect. However, VDV has proven himself time and again, scoring 3 goals in the PL. For the ultra short-term pre-WC pick, he offers potential against West Ham (H) and Burnley (A). These fixtures could see him repeat those mega hauls from before.

Richards (£4.4m)

Palace boast a strong XI and can beat anyone on their day, provided the starting lineup gets enough rest. For the season, they rank 7th in best defence (by xGC), before dropping to 15th over the last 6 weeks. The midweek fixtures surely took a toll, and we might see Glasner shift priorities towards the Conference League, but being out of the FA Cup should ease the tiredness.

Given this Palace landscape, Richards emerges as a nice budget-friendly option without the hefty price tag of his teammates. He averaged ~10.64 CBIT per 90 before his GW18 injury this season. Their fixtures look solid in the medium term, offering a good jump-on point for FPL managers.

Rodon (£3.9m)

Joe Rodon has quietly become a budget defender gem for Leeds this season. Owned by just 3.4% of managers, he offers solid DefCon upside at 3.9m (8.18 DC per 90 minutes) – perfect for enabling premium moves elsewhere. Before his injury, he nailed regular 90-minute starts and should slot straight back into the XI. He rotates well with other budget options, providing robust cover across the 10-GW run.

Budget Midfielders

Harry Wilson (£5.9m)

Harry Wilson has been in the form of his life. He is enjoying himself on the pitch, fuelling Fulham’s unbeaten run over their last 6 league games. For players under 6m, he tops the xGI/90 list (0.6) over the last 6 GWs. Further, he loves taking shots whenever possible – with 18 since GW16. Only 3 Midfielders have taken more shots than Wilson during this time.

Top Midfielders for xGI over the last 6 Gameweeks: (Min 300 mins)

  • Schade- 4.7
  • Wilson- 3.7
  • Cherki- 3.6
  • Enzo- 3.5
  • Wirtz- 3.3

While his price has hit the higher end of affordability, his fixtures remain decent, making him a solid option.

Enzo Le Fée (£4.9m) / Granit Xhaka (£5.2m)

Sunderland boys make an appearance here too. Xhaka has been the 4th-highest FPL point scorer under 6m, with Le Fee just 17 points behind. Over the last 6 GWs, Le Fee’s attacking stats have stood out. While Xhaka edges DefCon with 11.15 DC per 90 this season (vs Le Fee’s 8.91), both deliver incredible value.

Sunderland’s fixtures offer great attacking potential, and both Le Fee and Xhaka provide superb bang for buck.

Marcus Tavernier (£5.5m)

Tavernier enters as an extremely exciting pick. Semenyo’s exit and Kluivert’s injury demand a step-up. Tavernier could be the right man. He should feature regularly as Bournemouth embark on a wonderful fixture run. He is on majority of corners, free kicks and likely to be on penalties as well.

They face Wolves, West Ham, Sunderland, and Burnley over the next 9 weeks – with only a weakened Liverpool from the top sides.

Dango (£5.8m) / Janelt (£4.9m)

With Dango returning from Afcon soon, he makes for a great midfield option to pair with the likes of Thiago. Brentford have exceeded expectations this season, sitting 5th in the table, their fixtures are starting to dry up. Considering that, managers might prefer the cheaper Janelt to free up ~1m elsewhere.

James Garner (£5.1m)

Among the Toffees, while Dewsbury-Hall garnered plenty of popularity, Garner has flown slightly under the radar (owned by just 3.6% of managers). He ranks high on DefCon potential (11.61 DC per 90 minutes this season) while delivering a minimum of 4 points over the last 6 GWs. His underlying numbers have been solid in that span – xG/90 of 0.06 and xA/90 of 0.21. His creativity has been pivotal for the team, and his pitch presence (as seen in heat maps for touches) directly boosts his DefCon ability.

Everton’s fixtures are not too shabby, with some attractive matchups thrown in till GW30.

Anton Stach (£4.9m)

Stach has enjoyed a great season, racking up 87 FPL points. His DefCon potential sits at 9.59 DC/90- slightly below the midfielder threshold of 12 – but he has been extremely consistent. Stach’s attacking threat is excellent for the price, with an xGI/90 of 0.4 over the last 6 GWs and 17 shots taken. Plus, his set-piece involvement offers another route to points.

Elliot Anderson (£5.3m)

Anderson embodies the archetype of these standout DM picks, delivering exactly as expected. An improvement in Forest’s form arrives amid a slightly tricky fixture run. However, the 3-game stretch against Palace, Leeds, and Wolves could unlock attacking returns, while tougher ones suit his DefCon upside. He posts outrageousDC/90 numbers at 13.67- topping midfielders and crossing the threshold on average. Dyche’s system certainly aids him here.

Budget Forwards

Dominic Calvert-Lewin (£6.0m)

DCL is into another PL season and has already bagged 9 goals. He boasts the joint-highest xGI/90 over the last 6 GWs (alongside Haaland, Ekitike, and Watkins at 0.8). He has been clinical too, scoring 5 from 7 shots on target in that span. He is primed to convert Leeds’ creativity into goals. Targeting the 3-game run in GW24-26 could yield big rewards.

Mateus Mané (£4.5m)

Mane has arrived as a beacon of hope for Wolves. Over4 league starts, he has scored 2 goals and assisted 2. Wolves certainly aren’t a team with big expectations and won’t be a transfer priority. However, for budget depth and his talismanic quality, Mane offers solid squad cover and value. His xGI/90 over the last 6 GWs stands at 0.2, with 2.34 shots per 90.

Kroupi.Jr (£4.6m)

Kroupi.Jr, alongside Evanilson, has earned decent minutes in the league. He remains a rotation option without a full 90 yet. From 7 starts, he has scored 7 goals – an extraordinary return for his price. He provides strong bench depth and a smart downgrade for that 3rd striker spot. With Semenyo leaving the club and Kluivert injured, his minutes should eventually improve in the coming weeks.

Conclusion

The midfield spot is spoilt for choice among budget options – thanks to the Meta shift and DefCon introduction. Premium defenders (especially Arsenal’s dominance) have pushed formations to 4 at the back. Budget picks become crucial now, as premiums like Palmer and Bruno start emerging.

Further Reads from ALLABOUTFPL Ahead of FPL GW22

Upcoming FPL Double/Blank Gameweeks | 25/26 FPL Season
FPL GW22 Scout Picks based on Stats and Matchups
Top FPL Gameweek 22 Captain Picks Based on Analysis & Metrics
Best FPL GW22 Differential Picks(<10% TSB)
AK’s FPL GW22 Team Reveal and Transfer Plans
FPL GW22 Transfer Targets & Watchlist Based on Stats & Eye Test
FPL GW22 Wildcard Team – Tips, Players to Target and Best Drafts
FPL Gameweek 22 Transfer Tips: Two Players to Buy, Hold, & Sell
Best FPL Budget Enablers to Target – Position-wise from GW22 Onwards
FPL GW22 Ultimate Guide: Tips, Differentials, Captaincy & More

Link to all our FPL GW22 blogs, including buy, hold, sell analysis, differentials, captaincy metrics, transfer targets, and more. Completely free to access as well!

Thanks for reading the ‘Best FPL Budget Enablers to Target – Position wise | FPL GW22’ blog. Keep checking allaboutfpl.com for regular blogs and updates. Also, follow our 250,000+ community on InstagramThreads, Facebook, and Twitter to stay updated on regular Posts and FPL updates.

What’s next from ALLABOUTFPL ahead of FPL Gameweek 22 of the 2025/26 FPL Season?

We’ll be covering differential picks, transfer targets, Buy, Hold, Sell analysis, Scout picks, Gameweek preview, Captaincy metrics, FPL GW22 tips, and more. Keep checking allaboutfpl.com for all our blogs. We’ll also be posting regularly about the same on our social media accounts so follow us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook and keep our notification ON.

Link to all our FPL GW22 blogs in one place & fully free to access without any paywall!
FPL enthusiast with 3× Top 100k finishes (best 5k), sharing views through a blend of clean stats and match context; being a Man United fan, I try to use numbers to the bias out :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top